7535
Concern about unjustified delays in judicial processes (whether public or private) is not new, rather historical. However, the right to a speedy trial, as a constitutional clause, only began to be recognized in the second half of the 20th century. In this sense, our Supreme Court of Justice has foll...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7535 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_7535.dir/7535.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Concern about unjustified delays in judicial processes (whether public or private) is not new, rather historical. However, the right to a speedy trial, as a constitutional clause, only began to be recognized in the second half of the 20th century. In this sense, our Supreme Court of Justice has followed a clear and progressive jurisprudential line where it recognizes the right, its principles and the parameters for its analysis; albeit with some recent disagreements. From this perspective, this work intends to carry out a historical journey linked to the recognition of the right, its determining elements and the consequences of its violation to present the current standard and certain paradigms that we visualize on the horizon of its development, based on the transformative processes that our procedural law goes through. For this, its contextualization in our law implies expressing the historical evolution of the adopted procedural models and the new paradigm that emerged from the transformative processes of recent times |
|---|