7251

The work develops an empirical study that aims to analyze and evaluate the implementation of the Federal Housing Improvement Program (PFMV) "Mejor Vivir" in the Northern region of Argentina, specifically in the provinces of Chaco and Tucumán, during the period 2003-2013. The object of stud...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Motta, Jorge Martín
Otros Autores: Pelli, Víctor Saúl
Formato: Tesis doctoral acceptedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7251
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_7251.dir/7251.PDF
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:The work develops an empirical study that aims to analyze and evaluate the implementation of the Federal Housing Improvement Program (PFMV) "Mejor Vivir" in the Northern region of Argentina, specifically in the provinces of Chaco and Tucumán, during the period 2003-2013. The object of study focuses on the participation of the beneficiaries of housing improvement programs, while the analysis is centered around the role their participation plays in the resulting quality of the intervened housing and the level of satisfaction they express regarding their housing. The main theoretical concepts guiding the research are participation, housing progressivity, and housing improvement, stemming from the field of housing studies but also drawing from contributions in urbanism, urban sociology, architecture, and social anthropology, among other disciplinary fields. Participation is understood as a process involving the non-spontaneous association of different actors (with diverse interests) to achieve a specific objective, which implies cooperation and the sharing of power among them to fulfill that objective using limited resources. In the context of the research, participation is also a problem, and its analysis requires a complex approach: the goal is to identify and characterize different types and levels of participation involving the recipients of housing interventions from housing improvement programs and to assess how participation influences the outcomes of the PFMV interventions in Chaco and Tucumán during the specified period, specifically considering the quality of housing and the satisfaction of the recipients regarding these interventions. The notion of housing progressivity refers to the construction of housing in stages over time, as the only means available to many families lacking savings to access a finished home or to build one within limited time frames. Progressivity is marked by the modifications the housing undergoes in the process of progressively improving the domestic habitat. It is recognized that this construction modality supports the social production of habitat and housing improvement as a variant of housing policies and can be a source of well-being for the recipients in relation to housing produced through their own efforts. The link between these concepts results in the research hypothesis, which asserts that housing improvement programs carried out with the participation of the beneficiaries significantly enhance the satisfaction and quality of housing for urban populations living in precarious and impoverished conditions. The development of the work is divided into three main parts. Firstly, the approach to the conceptual framework addresses the issue of popular habitat, housing progressivity, and the participation of beneficiaries in the process of improving their habitat. This section also analyzes the experience of urban, habitat and housing improvement programs in the Latin American and Argentine context. Secondly, the methodological framework of the research is discussed, where the main approaches and evaluation instruments are presented. Finally, the study of cases is approached, which delves into the Argentine experience of the Federal Housing Improvement Program (PFMV) "Mejor Vivir", particularly in its implementation in the provinces of Chaco and Tucumán. Based on the analysis and evaluation of the case study, reflections are developed on the practice of housing improvement and its impact on Latin American and Argentine housing policies. In this regard, the work proposes optimizations for the studied program and its better performance within the country's housing policy.