6971
This article is divided into three parts. In the first, inspired by Simondon's mechanological proposal, we present a "Judicial Mechanology", in relation to the epistemic perspective of "aesthetics of law", which we have been developing in our research with Dr. Christian Kess...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/21/mecanologia-judicial-y-estetica%20del-derecho-segun-simondon.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_6971 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_6971.dir/6971.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article is divided into three parts. In the first, inspired by Simondon's mechanological proposal, we present a "Judicial Mechanology", in relation to the epistemic perspective of "aesthetics of law", which we have been developing in our research with Dr. Christian Kessel & team, at the Gioja Institute of the Facultad de Derecho (UBA). We seek to recover a notion of jurisprudence that refers to "transcendental empiricism" (Hume, Deleuze) and to a "cosmopolitical practice of law" (Stengers). We illustrate this presentation with two reference cases that appear in the second and third part of this article respectively: the first case proposes to approach the Cossio-Kelsen debate in the register of controversial studies, attending to three epistemic and philosophical questions: around Kant, around phenomenology, and around Gestaltung or design. This last question gives rise to the notion of justice design, from which we approach, in the third and last part of this article, the urban reforms in the Comuna 13 of Medellin as a second mechanological case. Thus, we propose the notion of "jurisprudential performance" as an instrument of attention on urban design procedures that, in principle, would seem to be outside the legal field but which, from a mechanological simondonian perspective, are illuminating with respect to the scope of jurisprudential practices,
conceived cosmopolitically in relation to judicial and techno-aesthetic practices |
|---|