6816
The present paper analyzes three constitutional interpretations about the stability of administrative acts, in relation to the annulment power of the Public Administration. In this regard, the first postulation we explore is based on the 17 and 109 articles of the Constitution; the second, on the du...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/20/tres-tesis-sobre-los-limites-constitucionales-de-la-potestad-anulatoria.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_6816 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_6816.dir/6816.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The present paper analyzes three constitutional interpretations about the stability of administrative acts, in relation to the annulment power of the Public Administration. In this regard, the first postulation we explore is based on the 17 and 109 articles of the Constitution; the second, on the due process of law and the third, on the object of the act, according to whether or not it creates fundamental rights. Subsequently, we make an evaluative analysis of these different theses |
|---|