6794
The COVID-19 pandemic gave room to authoritarian responses. Many governments declared state of emergency or exception, in which they could derogate from protected rights under international treaties. In this article I state that the declaration of the state of emergency is not adequate to the circum...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/19/pensando-los-poderes-del-gobierno-en-pandemia.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_6794 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_6794.dir/6794.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The COVID-19 pandemic gave room to authoritarian responses. Many governments declared state of emergency or exception, in which they could derogate from protected rights under international treaties. In this article I state that the declaration of the state of emergency is not adequate to the circumstances, which, specifically, requires a more robust standard of rights. I am not proposing an inactive government but one which works with acts adopted by Parliament and imposing legitimate restrictions, proportionate to the situation. |
|---|