20201002 SZEJER_TESIS_Dimensi�n epist�mica y dimensi�n institucional_Saber y Praxis Proyectual_TOMO 1.pdf
This doctoral thesis covers the institutional history of the FAU-FADU, UBA and its disciplines -Architecture, Designs and Urbanism-, during the period 1947- 1988. The institutional evolution is interpreted in the light of the different political, social and economic events that are part of the histo...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Tesis doctoral acceptedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_6727 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_6727.dir/6727.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This doctoral thesis covers the institutional history of the FAU-FADU, UBA and its disciplines -Architecture, Designs and Urbanism-, during the period 1947- 1988. The institutional evolution is interpreted in the light of the different political, social and economic events that are part of the history of our country. At the same time, these disciplinary knowledges are placed in relation to the Regime of Knowledge dominant in Western culture, of which, with its particularities, Argentina is a part.
When delving into the institutional history of the FAUFADU, UBA reveals the existence of an epistemic dimension that refers to the strategies around this disciplinary knowledge in its academic training objectives, in the offer of postgraduate studies, in the research programs that are carried out, and / or, in the search for new orientations, establishing the criteria of truth that give meaning to knowledge and project practice. This dimension is legitimized from the institutional dimension, which alludes to a series of regulations, ordinances and legal discourses, from where it is possible to construct closures and alterities in relation to other knowledge and between the disciplines that make up the FADU, UBA territory. The articulation of both evidence, when, why and under what circumstances certain theoretical proposals are assumed or others are left aside; how the disciplinary domains are specified and how the links with Society and the State are articulated, in a development that involves university authorities who become protagonists of the future of project disciplines at the UBA.
The social role as an institution of the State, the attributes instituted by laws and the functions that the University of Buenos Aires, and therefore the FADU, has as a university institution define its ability to institute discourses and differential practices for Architecture, Designs (the use of the term is generic) and Urbanism, while legitimizing the identity of its academic community. This singular condition, in turn, forces us to recognize that, as a singular case. For this reason, analyzing, researching and reflecting on the FAU-FADU, UBA institution implies revealing a particular historiography that ties to the development of project disciplines, personal and academic trajectories where the political positions of university actors are expressed, who in a situation of institutional power, define the necessary knowledge, the objectives of disciplinary training, practices and professional profiles.
The review of the past of the academic-institutional regime of the FAU-FADU, UBA reveals a tradition in the teaching and learning of project disciplines -the Project / Project Workshop- which expresses, in its different versions, the links that the university authorities imagined between, University and Society, between discipline and profession, between education and political praxis.
From another point of view, knowing the academicinstitutional past is understanding those educational projects that constitute the heritage on which the current academic-institutional regime FADU, UBA is deployed. This legacy can be criticized, disapproved, but never ignored, since ultimately it is an instance from which to recover the always necessary tension between tradition and disciplinary innovation. |
|---|