Negacionismo y libertad de expresión : reflexiones en torno a la criminalización

Abstract: The criminalization of genocide denial has generated controversies, which includes answering whether freedom of expression reaches the determination of how each person wants to relate to the past. Liberal criminal law holds that people have the right to delineate their own life plan and th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Thus, Valeria
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2019
Materias:
Negacionismo
Libertad de expresion
Democracia
Derecho performativo
Daño negacionista
Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos
Derecho penal
Participacion ciudadana
Responsabilidad del Estado
Ciudadano
Lenguaje
Criminalizacion
Antinegacionismo juridico
Opinion publica
Medios de comunicacion de masas
Genocide denial
Freedom of speech
Democracy
Performative law
International human rights law
Criminal Law
Citizen participation
Rule of law
State responsibility
Language
Social communication
Legal antinegationism
Criminalization
Public opinion
Communication media
Acceso en línea:http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/102/negacionismo-y-libertad-de-expresion.pdf
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5515
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_5515.dir/5515.PDF
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract: The criminalization of genocide denial has generated controversies, which includes answering whether freedom of expression reaches the determination of how each person wants to relate to the past. Liberal criminal law holds that people have the right to delineate their own life plan and these expressions should be tolerated although we dislike them as a requirement of consensual democracies. This work critically addresses these claims, assuming two strategies: a) incorporating the historical perspective of freedom of expression and resignification of its content and limits that the human rights paradigm post Auschwitz establishes and b) addressing the relationship between freedom of expression and equality as a strategy to mitigate the damages and risks that the negationist practices entail, at the same time to delve into the role of language in our societies and the denials of state crimes, which are not innocent at all. Time and relationship as key elements to (re) think about the relationship between freedom of expression, victims and denialist discourses.

Ejemplares similares