5077
The main aim of this thesis is to analyze the common spaces in collective housing understood as a common good. For this purpose, the common spaces present in five case studies are analyzed: 1) the Sargfabrik housing and services cooperative in the city of Vienna; 2) the Monteagudo Housing Complex in...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Tesis doctoral acceptedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5077 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_5077.dir/5077.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The main aim of this thesis is to analyze the common spaces in collective housing understood as a common good. For this purpose, the common spaces present in five case studies are analyzed: 1) the Sargfabrik housing and services cooperative in the city of Vienna; 2) the Monteagudo Housing Complex in the city of Buenos Aires; 3) the Walden 7 building in the municipality of Sant Just Desvern, Barcelona; 4) the 111 building in the city of Terrassa, Barcelona and; 5) the Parque Los Andes neighborhood in the city of Buenos Aires. The thesis affirms that the common space -the co-place - is not uniform. The co-place presents three dimensional levels established on the basis of its utility - Private, Common and Public co-places. In turn, within each of these three-dimensional levels, we detect three types of co-places classified according to their use: Individual, Involved and Concurrent. The thesis defines nine types of co-location used to analyze the five case studies considered. The category of co-place means overcoming the dichotomy between private and public space, in an attempt to integrate them.
Co-places are the opportunity to rethink new modes of co-habitation open to experimentation, co-participation, the recognition of the contribution of others, understanding that people not only demand goods and services - within the space of the city as well as in the housing - but also seek recognition as subjects-part of the collective history, as practitioners of that decision-making process on everything that affects our lives. |
|---|