Sentencias feministas como recursos para la enseñanza

Abstract: While academic scholarship generally offers various forms of commentary on decided cases, feminist judgment-writing projects have recently embarked on a new form of critical scholarship. Rather than critiquing judgments from a feminist perspective in academic essays, the participants in th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hunter, Rosemary
Otros Autores: Vivas Lucic, Aldana, trad.
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.derecho.uba.ar/index.php/academia/article/view/424/377
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=academia&cl=CL1&d=HWA_4062
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/academia/index/assoc/HWA_4062.dir/4062.PDF
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract: While academic scholarship generally offers various forms of commentary on decided cases, feminist judgment-writing projects have recently embarked on a new form of critical scholarship. Rather than critiquing judgments from a feminist perspective in academic essays, the participants in these projects have set out instead to write alternative judgments, as if they had been one of the judges sitting in court at the time. After introducing the UK Feminist Judgments Project and describing what is "different" about the judgments it has produced, the paper explains some of the ways in which these judgments have been used as teaching resources in UK law schools. The paper goes on to introduce the following four articles in this issue of the Law Teacher, which illustrate in greater detail particular pedagogical uses of the Feminist Judgments Project.