DERECHo A lA EDUCACIÓN Y ENSEÑANzA RElIgIoSA: UN CoMENTARIo SoBRE lA...

In this article we propose a comment regarding the decision made by the Argentine Supreme Court on the compulsory religious education in the curricula and during school hours in public primary schools. Firstly, we revise the case law in education. Then, we analyze the arguments expressed in "Ca...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Scioscioli, Sebastián
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2019
Materias:
Derecho a la educacion
Enseñanza religiosa
Jurisprudencia
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación
Caso "Castillo"
Derecho constitucional
Enseñanza publica
Libertad religiosa
CSJN
Doctrina
Right to Education
Religious Education
Jurisprudence
Acceso en línea:http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=juridica&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3854
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/juridica/index/assoc/HWA_3854.dir/3854.PDF
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:In this article we propose a comment regarding the decision made by the Argentine Supreme Court on the compulsory religious education in the curricula and during school hours in public primary schools. Firstly, we revise the case law in education. Then, we analyze the arguments expressed in "Castillo" decision, paying special attention to those related to the principles of religious neutrality, among others. As a conclusion, we will argue that the Supreme Court did not argue enough (or did not want) to achieve a definitive rule about laicism in public schools, in accordance with a progressive and pro personae interpretation of the right to education content in the normative, constitutional and conventional development of human rights in Argentina.

Ejemplares similares