Lenguaje, derecho y significados sociales : contribuciones de la antropología lingüística al estudio del derecho
Scholars who study the social constitution of law have increasingly come to appreciate the importance of language in legal processes. This review considers the question, what difference does this attention to language make? I discuss a number of ways of approaching language, suggesting that some are...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.derecho.uba.ar/index.php/academia/article/view/508/453 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=academia&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3305 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/academia/index/assoc/HWA_3305.dir/3305.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Scholars who study the social constitution of law have increasingly come to appreciate the importance of language in legal processes. This review considers the question, what difference does this attention to language make? I discuss a number of ways of approaching language, suggesting that some are more useful than others for social and legal analysis. In particular, I focus on the contribution of anthropological approaches and two recent works: Getting justice and getting even: legal consciousness among working-class Americans, by Sally Engle Merry, and Rules versus relationships: the ethnography of legal discourse, by John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr. The first section of the essay gives an overview of anthropological and linguistic approaches. The second section focuses on the study of language and law. |
|---|