Para una historia del derecho público en la Argentina (siglos XIX-XX) : tradiciones, saberes, conceptos
This essay attempts to reflect on the history of public law, particularly, from the ways in which it was traditionally thought of within legal dogmatic discourse in Argentina. In that sense, this writing tries to explain some conceptual conditioners with respect to the State and the statism that con...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.derecho.uba.ar/index.php/academia/article/view/459/410 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=academia&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3258 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/academia/index/assoc/HWA_3258.dir/3258.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This essay attempts to reflect on the history of public law, particularly, from the ways in which it was traditionally thought of within legal dogmatic discourse in Argentina. In that sense, this writing tries to explain some conceptual conditioners with respect to the State and the statism that configure a particular intellectual habitus of jurists with respect to the use of history. From this point of departure, this intellectual exercise intends to explain some tensions regarding the separation of public and private law as structuring part of the legal project of modernity Likewise, the dogmatic uses of the past that the constitutional law and its history make with respect to a more encompassed public law are observed. Finally, it tries to show the existence of historical conflicting traditions between the disciplines that constitute public law with respect to classical liberal constitutionalism. From the historical-conceptual analysis of these disciplines, which exhibits the agonic character of their discourses, we try to explain the absence of a history of public law and the potential that it has to understand the tensions that currently produce traditions with histories and principles that cannot be assimilated to each other. |
|---|