Legitimación de la progenitora para reclamar el daño no patrimonial derivado de la omisión del reconocimiento de su hijo
The Civil and Commercial Code explicitly acknowledges redress for torts that derive from disavowal of paternity. However, it does not state anything about mothers' entitlement to claim redress for nonpecuniary or moral damage in this situation. According to the Code, mothers are indirectly inju...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/101/legitimacion-de-la-progenitora-para-reclamar-el-dano-patrimonial-derivado-de-la-omision-del-reconocimiento-de-su-hijo.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3217 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_3217.dir/3217.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The Civil and Commercial Code explicitly acknowledges redress for torts that derive from disavowal of paternity. However, it does not state anything about mothers' entitlement to claim redress for nonpecuniary or moral damage in this situation. According to the Code, mothers are indirectly injured by the intentional disavowal of paternity. Despite this, the position -sustained by doctrine and jurisprudence- that is reluctant to consider redress admissible should be revised in cases in which this disinclined attitude does not only affect the child's right to an identity, but also the mother's fundamental rights to dignity and honor independently. Particularly, mothers' redess requires a gender-perspective analysis, as women's social vulnerability increases when facing single pregnancy, maternity and child rearing; especially, in contexts of poverty. |
|---|