3003
The reopening of the trials against the military after the decision of the Supreme Court ("Simón") started a long and interesting debate about its convenience. Many critics of the trials began to think on other possibilities (e.g. truth commissions). They argue that if we follow the path o...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/6/las-razones-del-castigo-retributivo.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3003 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_3003.dir/3003.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The reopening of the trials against the military after the decision of the Supreme Court ("Simón") started a long and interesting debate about its convenience. Many critics of the trials began to think on other possibilities (e.g. truth commissions). They argue that if we follow the path of the criminal trials we will resign truth and that they will not serve to restore the bases of the community. These arguments are very interesting but unpersuasive. In this paper I argue that there are reasons to defend and justify the criminal trials and to punish the perpetrators for their committed crimes. In the first part of the work I will defend the criminal trials from some of these critics. In the second part I attempt to present some rumination about a type of retributivism that would fit with the new trials in Argentina. |
|---|