2967
The purpose of this article is to deepen some of the debates that civil law has generated in art. 26 of the Civil and Commercial Code concerning the exercise of very personal rights of children and adolescents, in particular, the right of teenagers to care for their own body. The obligatory principl...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo acceptedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/14/autonomia-progresiva-de-ninxs-y-adolescentes-y-bioetica.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_2967 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_2967.dir/2967.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this article is to deepen some of the debates that civil law has generated in art. 26 of the Civil and Commercial Code concerning the exercise of very personal rights of children and adolescents, in particular, the right of teenagers to care for their own body. The obligatory principle of progressive autonomy has put in check the classic civil regulation. Bioethics is the field that has been impacted the most. How should those laws or special regulations that establish the legal age for the validity of certain medical acts be interpreted in the light of the civil legislation enforced since August 2015? To draft some plausible answers, certain notions, such as justified paternalism and irreversibility, are invoked. |
|---|