Descripción
Sumario:One of the most complex challenges that a general theory of human rights must face is what could be characterized as the universal test: are these valid through the world? Or, on the contrary, the multiculturalism (and the judicial pluralism that it implies), reveal incompatible conceptions, which may turn useless any judgement over behaviors that may be considered perverse or radically praised. In this essay, my purpose is to support, with the help of some judicial examples of Latin American constitucionalism, a universal theory of Human Rights that recognizes cultural differences, further on, they may be enriched with them, and maybe offer a minimum perspective on behalf of people's "basic values" and yet recognizing the fact of multiculturalism.