2945

Based on a historical review of the most significant cases of the Supreme Court of Justice on issues related to public opinion, this paper emphasizes how this institution can overcome through their own traditional judicial activity the restricted view of public opinion regarding the participation bo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sancari, Sebastián
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2016
Materias:
Opinión pública
Participación política
Medios de comunicación
Debate público
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación
Derecho político
Comunicación política
CSJN
Public opinion
Political participation
Media
Public debate
Acceso en línea:http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/9/el-debate-publico-y-los-actores-de-la-politica-en-el-ambito-de-la-corte-suprema.pdf
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_2945
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_2945.dir/2945.PDF
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:Based on a historical review of the most significant cases of the Supreme Court of Justice on issues related to public opinion, this paper emphasizes how this institution can overcome through their own traditional judicial activity the restricted view of public opinion regarding the participation bounded to the electoral process and public debate channeled through the press, evolving into one with broader participatory margins.

Ejemplares similares