2929
In the "Fontevecchia" case, the Supreme Court changed its posture in regards to the enforceability of the judgement passed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights that sentences Argentina to overrule its judicial resolutions. This created a precedent that could have consequences in the...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/10/comentarios-sobre-fontevecchia-la-autoridad-de-las-sentencias-de-la-corte-interamericana-y-los-principios-de-derecho-publico-argentino.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_2929 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_2929.dir/2929.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the "Fontevecchia" case, the Supreme Court changed its posture in regards to the enforceability of the judgement passed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights that sentences Argentina to overrule its judicial resolutions. This created a precedent that could have consequences in the constitutional value of Human Rights. This paper studies some implications of this. |
|---|