2911
In the history of Philosophy, the moral debate has been described according to qualities such as universality, abstraction and rules that answer to the privileged masculinities that started it. Women have been described as inferior and uncapable of reasoning. This has served a political and institut...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/12/el-dilema-moral-del-aborto.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_2911 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_2911.dir/2911.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the history of Philosophy, the moral debate has been described according to qualities such as universality, abstraction and rules that answer to the privileged masculinities that started it. Women have been described as inferior and uncapable of reasoning. This has served a political and institutional organization where men took into their hands the reproductive and non-reproductive decisions of women. The strongest examples are the ones in the ethics of Aristotle and Kant. The feminist Philosophy of the last third of the twentieth century has provided critical and propositional postures in regard to women's moral deliberation, which have a direct influence in the dilemmas that affect them in an exclusive manner, like abortion. Carol Gilligan's Ethics of care presents a different structure of moral reasoning that moves away general and abstract rules to emphasize connectivity, responsibility conflicts and empathy. |
|---|