La libertad en los tiempos de tiranía : sobre las ideas, la evolución y el paradójico nacimiento legislativo de la motivación judicial
The author analyzes the importance of judicial argumentation and holds that the duty to justify judgments is a key element of the rule of law and the republican system. The period analyzed ranges from 1810 to 1838, in Argentina. The article draws a connection between the ideas of the Age of Enlighte...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/85/07-ensayo-juan-pablo-falcon.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1242 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1242.dir/1242.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The author analyzes the importance of judicial argumentation and holds that the duty to justify judgments is a key element of the rule of law and the republican system. The period analyzed ranges from 1810 to 1838, in Argentina. The article draws a connection between the ideas of the Age of Enlightenment and of Rationalism of the 18th century. Following a thorough analysis of historical events, the author finishes with the fortunate paradox of Argentine legal history - the first statutorily - imposed requirement to justify judgments, enacted under a tyrannical regime |
|---|