Sobre el criterio de distinción entre la interrupción de cursos causales salvadores iniciados por terceros o provenientes de la naturaleza y la causación directa
Criminal law theory tends to distinguish between direct causation and interruption of causal salvation courses. The latter category, nonetheless, has been analyzed on a case-by-case basis which has given rise to a series of systematic difficulties. Accordingly, in this article I will try to demonst...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/93/sobre-el-criterio-de-distincion-entre-la-interrupcion-de-cursos-causales-salvadores-iniciados-por-terceros-o-provenientes-de-la-naturaleza-y-la-causacion-directa.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1186 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1186.dir/1186.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Criminal law theory tends to distinguish between direct causation and interruption of causal salvation courses. The latter category, nonetheless, has been analyzed on a case-by-case basis which has given rise to a series of systematic difficulties. Accordingly, in this article I will try to demonstrate that this traditional distinction is highly problematic. For that purpose, I will focus on cases of interruption of causal salvation courses ?in which the salvation course may come from\na third person action as well as from nature- and I will compare them with those usually accepted as cases of direct causation |
|---|