El derecho "supralegal" frente a graves violaciones de derechos humanos
This article goes into the way in which the iusphilosophical debate\nhas been renewed as of the last half of the 20th century, thanks to the action of\nthe Justice regarding gross violations of human rights, such as those which took\nplace during Nazism, the former German Democratic Republic or the...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/88/lecciones-y-ensayos-88-paginas-83-100.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1085 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1085.dir/1085.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article goes into the way in which the iusphilosophical debate\nhas been renewed as of the last half of the 20th century, thanks to the action of\nthe Justice regarding gross violations of human rights, such as those which took\nplace during Nazism, the former German Democratic Republic or the last military\ndictatorship in Argentina.\nHart?s criticism to ?Radbruch?s formula,? devised in the postwar period, is briefly\nset out, as well as Fuller?s questioning thereof and the reflection of such debate\non the decisions entered by post-Nazi German courts, post-Soviet courts and\npost-dictatorial Argentine courts.\nIn addition, an intervention in the above mentioned debate is made, putting\nforward an alternative look, which is, according to the author, superseding and which is in line with the international tendency towards the positivization of\nfundamental rights and the placement thereof at a stage above laws |
|---|