El daño directo en la ley de defensa del consumidor
Act 26.361 has instituted a major reform to the Consumer Defense statute.\nAmong its many provisions, which have raised all kinds of opinions, there is one that\nhas been almost unanimously rejected by jurists ? the direct damages. This essay is a\ndetailed yet critic commentary to the good intentio...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/90/brodsky-coto.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1034 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1034.dir/1034.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Act 26.361 has instituted a major reform to the Consumer Defense statute.\nAmong its many provisions, which have raised all kinds of opinions, there is one that\nhas been almost unanimously rejected by jurists ? the direct damages. This essay is a\ndetailed yet critic commentary to the good intentions and poor results of the legislator |
|---|