Pseudo-Denys: Divergences and Reconcilements Between the Divine Names and Parmenides
In this article we study what is commonly characterized as “dependence'” of Divine Names in relation with Neoplatonic Tradition, particularly Proclus, emphasizing his agreements and divergences. In this way, we will confront, at first sight, some platonic ideas, to soon engage in a comparative...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7825 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7825_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In this article we study what is commonly characterized as “dependence'” of Divine Names in relation with Neoplatonic Tradition, particularly Proclus, emphasizing his agreements and divergences. In this way, we will confront, at first sight, some platonic ideas, to soon engage in a comparative analysis with the Neoplatonic Commentary of Proclus. |
|---|