On the Prudentia in the First Commentaries to the Ethica Vetus. The Lectura Abrincensis in Ethicam Veterem (ca. 1230)

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

This paper focuses on the way in which the first commentators of the Ethica vetus (Books II and III of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics) understood the notion of prudentia. In order to do this, this work analyses one particular case: the anonymous Lectura Abrincensis in Ethicam veterem (ca. 1230), who...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cervera Novo, Violeta
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2016
Materias:
siglo XIII
edición crítica
prudentia
Aristóteles
recepción
13th century
Critical edition
Prudentia
Aristotle
Reception
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7733
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7733_oai
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:This paper focuses on the way in which the first commentators of the Ethica vetus (Books II and III of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics) understood the notion of prudentia. In order to do this, this work analyses one particular case: the anonymous Lectura Abrincensis in Ethicam veterem (ca. 1230), whose understanding of prudentia is closely related to Phillip the Chancellor’s Summa de bono (ca. 1228). The Appendix offers a critical edition of an excerpt of the Lectura Abrincensis.

Ejemplares similares