Advantages of Histoire Croisée for the study of Spartan History in the Classical Period
The political relationship between the Greek poleis were comprehensible because of the Mediterranean Sea, a relational space of a limited dimension. Bearing in mind this situation, our aim is to analyse the political relationship carried out by the spartiate navarch Lysander in Greece during the Cla...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares |
| Lenguaje: | Portugués |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/analesHAMM/article/view/7609 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=moderna&d=7609_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The political relationship between the Greek poleis were comprehensible because of the Mediterranean Sea, a relational space of a limited dimension. Bearing in mind this situation, our aim is to analyse the political relationship carried out by the spartiate navarch Lysander in Greece during the Classical period through the theoretical framework of the French Discourse Analysis and Network Theory, and the comparative perspective offered by the Histoire Croisée. We propose that a research on multiple temporalities and specialities will help to overcome the Athenocentric historiographical trend that considers Lysander and king Agesilaos II as the solely responsible for the disruption of their society. |
|---|