Ricardo Rojas y Benvenuto Terracini: destierro, muerte y bio-política de las lenguas
In this paper we address the discourse on the death, contact and change of languages in two texts that we have read and compared: the book Archipiélago [Archipielago] by Ricardo Rojas (1942) and the article “Cómo muere una lengua” [How does a language die?] by Benvenu...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/filologia/article/view/2461 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=filologia&d=2461_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In this paper we address the discourse on the death, contact and change of languages in two texts that we have read and compared: the book Archipiélago [Archipielago] by Ricardo Rojas (1942) and the article “Cómo muere una lengua” [How does a language die?] by Benvenuto Terracini (1951). In our analysis, we emphasize the tensions and conflicts arising in both texts as part of a field in construction: the field of the lin-guistic and philological studies. We also inquire into discursive constructions about language and otherness developed by both texts and the “glotopolitics” implications associated with those positions. |
|---|