Ficción y referencia: notas en contra de la estrategia descriptivista en su versión fregeana clásica

The paper contains a critical analysis of the Classical Fregean version of the descriptivist strategy for the semantic analysis of fictional discourse. In the first part, the Fregean analysis of fictive uses is exposed, against which two main points are made: (i) there are some problems in applying...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Orlando, Eleonora
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/2442
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cufilo&d=2442_oai
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:The paper contains a critical analysis of the Classical Fregean version of the descriptivist strategy for the semantic analysis of fictional discourse. In the first part, the Fregean analysis of fictive uses is exposed, against which two main points are made: (i) there are some problems in applying the Fregean notion of sense to fictional names occurring in fictive uses of statements; (ii) contrarily to what seems to be assumed, the idea of simulation is compatible with both reference and truth. The second part, focused on metafictive uses, has also two main points: (i) problems similar to the above-mentioned ones arise when the notion of sense is applied to fictional names occurring in metafictive uses; (ii) Church´s proposal for extending Frege´s theory so as to account for the intuitive truth of negative existentials containing fictional names is not clearly justified. In conclusion, traditional descriptivism, even if it may appear to be attractive by virtue of its ontological moderation, does not succeed in providing us with an adequate account of the semantic content of fictional discourse.