Nietzsche and Kant around the unknown X: Story of an Error
Nietzsche rejects several aspects of Kantian thought, without recognizing the closeness between his idea of fiction and the place that Kant attributes to transcendental ideas as “heuristic fictions.” The reasons why Nietzsche assimilates Kantian thought to metaphysics will be analyzed, and above all...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/16503 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cufilo&d=16503_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Nietzsche rejects several aspects of Kantian thought, without recognizing the closeness between his idea of fiction and the place that Kant attributes to transcendental ideas as “heuristic fictions.” The reasons why Nietzsche assimilates Kantian thought to metaphysics will be analyzed, and above all, his criticism of the categorical imperative and its consequences as “moral fanaticism”. The author who recognizes, at the beginning of the 20th century, this Nietzsche-Kant closeness around the idea of fiction is Hans Vaihinger, therefore, we will focus on his analysis of the issue in Nietzschean thought. |
|---|