The discourses of the public and their political reach
This paper extends in a brief examination of the place assigned to discourse by some authors such as Jürgen Habermas, Karl-Otto Apel or Julio De Zan as an instance of legitimacy and meta institutional critic of society. A review of opposing positions such as Arnold Gehlen or Niklas Luhmann seeks to...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
ARFIL y UNL
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/9006 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This paper extends in a brief examination of the place assigned to discourse by some authors such as Jürgen Habermas, Karl-Otto Apel or Julio De Zan as an instance of legitimacy and meta institutional critic of society. A review of opposing positions such as Arnold Gehlen or Niklas Luhmann seeks to establish the scope and limits of public space –natural place of discourse– as a paradigmatic place for social interrelations of strong normative content oriented towards the validity of institutions. Finally, a series of precisions are made that are necessary for the claim of the importance of the public political space. |
|---|