Conjunctivism, Disjunctivism and Husserlian Phenomenology
The present work tries to highlight some of the main challenges brought by the task of placing Husserl in the debate between conjunctivists and disjunctivists. To do this, we will carry out a critical analysis of the discussion developed by Overgaard (2018). Based on this analysis, we will present t...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
ARFIL y UNL
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8973 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The present work tries to highlight some of the main challenges brought by the task of placing Husserl in the debate between conjunctivists and disjunctivists. To do this, we will carry out a critical analysis of the discussion developed by Overgaard (2018). Based on this analysis, we will present three challenges: first, the challenge of appropriately systematizing the fundamental discrepancies and the elements in common between the conjunctivist and disjunctivist positions; secondly, the challenge of using clearly and precisely the basic notions on which the debate has been traditionally articulated. Finally, we will address specific challenges regarding the interpretation of Husserl's Phenomenology. |
|---|