Hegel y el proyecto de pensar filosóficamente el derecho y el Estado
This paper explores the complex relationship between Hegelian philosophy and the reality of law and the state. It begins with an examination of the criticisms levelled by Marx, Stahl and Haym at the reconciliation between the rational and the actual in the framework of the modern state, as set out b...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
ARFIL y UNL
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14302 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This paper explores the complex relationship between Hegelian philosophy and the reality of law and the state. It begins with an examination of the criticisms levelled by Marx, Stahl and Haym at the reconciliation between the rational and the actual in the framework of the modern state, as set out by Hegel.It then goes on to discuss the Hegelian method, which combines a progressive categorical determination with a regressive justification of the exposition, allowing for a deeper understanding of legal institutions. The central argument of this paper is that the philosophy of law, as conceived by Hegel, should not be confined to a mere conceptual transposition of normative reality. Instead, it should identify fundamental legal categories and their deployment in the social context.Philosophy, according to this argument, must discern between necessary and contingent norms, assessing their validity through a praxis of intersubjective recognition.This approach, it is claimed, enables an immanent critique of existing norms, emphasising that not all juridical determinations are just or necessary. |
|---|