La vulneración a la prohibición de reformatio in peius en la jurisprudencia administrativa peruana en el caso de declaratorias de nulidad: un debate entre métodos interpretativos
This article analyzes the different existing criteria regarding the possible violation of the principle of prohibition of reform for the worse or reformatio in peius in the case of a prior declaration of nullity of a sanction, and how this issue has generated contradictory positions in jurisprudence...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Redoeda/article/view/13579 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article analyzes the different existing criteria regarding the possible violation of the principle of prohibition of reform for the worse or reformatio in peius in the case of a prior declaration of nullity of a sanction, and how this issue has generated contradictory positions in jurisprudence. of Peruvian courts and administrative councils. Thus, on the one hand, we have the courts and councils that advocate the full application of the principle and on the other, those that point out its inapplicability, alluding to the effects of declaring the administrative act null and void. In this context, the idea is postulated that at the heart of the debate lies the application of different interpretative methods of a principle collected as a rule, which instead of being opposed can be considered as a whole to guarantee that the content of the principle and the legal assets it protects. |
|---|