Resignificar «lo viejo» y reconfigurar «lo nuevo»: el Modelo Mundial Latinoamericano en el contexto de la sociología–política regional
There are two apparently antagonistic views about the validity, or otherwise, of the «old» paradigms that shaped Latin American political sociology: Manuel Garretón's, who posits the need for a change in the social sciences in the face of the new reality of the 21st century, and Guillermo O...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Culturas/article/view/12330 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | There are two apparently antagonistic views about the validity, or otherwise, of the «old» paradigms that shaped Latin American political sociology: Manuel Garretón's, who posits the need for a change in the social sciences in the face of the new reality of the 21st century, and Guillermo O'Donnell who validates those contributions. In this work, both visions are partially shared: the need to enunciate new paradigms in light of the new problems, as well as to resignify some of those «old» themes. In this sense, it seeks to highlight the report on global development, Catastrophe or new society? Latin American World Model (Herrera et al., 1977), written by Fundación Bariloche, Argentina. It is about rescuing a contribution only recognized as the ideological counterpart of The Limits to Growth (Meadows, et al., 1972), the «Report of the Club of Rome», elaborated by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). |
|---|