The variety of industrial systems: a critical comparison of new regionalist orthodoxy and regulatory theory
Outstanding research on the manufacturing industry observed that its particularity depends on socio-economic aspects that delimit a qualitatively differentiated territorial system. In view of this observation, the aim of this paper is to analyze comparatively how the new regionalist orthodoxy and th...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Pampa/article/view/11302 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Outstanding research on the manufacturing industry observed that its particularity depends on socio-economic aspects that delimit a qualitatively differentiated territorial system. In view of this observation, the aim of this paper is to analyze comparatively how the new regionalist orthodoxy and the theory of regulation conceptualized the specificity of industrial systems and, therefore, the qualitative variety at stake. The basic assumptions from which they start are compared and, from them, the limitations that both currents face are deduced. The paper argues that the limitations lie in the inability of both approaches to conceptualize the qualitative variety of economic systems in general. It outlines as an interpretative hypothesis that both currents fail to conceptualize the key moment in which social relations of different types are articulated, because they are unilaterally defined as social realities external to each other, hybridized a posteriori. |
|---|