The Discussion Section in Agricultural Sciences Research Articles: Legitimation and Defense of the Results
The aim of this paper is to recognize patterns of schematic structure and relevant linguistic resources in Discussions of research articles in the discipline of Agricultural Sciences. With this purpose, a corpus of four texts was analysed manually from the perspective of genre in systemic functional...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/DeSignosySentidos/article/view/10808 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim of this paper is to recognize patterns of schematic structure and relevant linguistic resources in Discussions of research articles in the discipline of Agricultural Sciences. With this purpose, a corpus of four texts was analysed manually from the perspective of genre in systemic functional linguistics. The results show two patterns of realization in two different genres. The first is the warranty of the research, which purpose is to legitimate the results found in order to persuade the readers of their value and to guarantee that they are pertinent to be incorporated to the body of disciplinary knowledge. The second is the analytic exposition, which purpose is obtaining the alignment of the readers to the Thesis proposed in an explicit or implicit way in the Introduction of the paper. The discourse-semantic resources found as relevant were those from the system of periodicity, which organize the information in the text, those of conjunction, particularly realised as logical metaphors and those of appraisal, especially from the subsystem of engagement. Although the corpus has been justified by the concept of instantiation, the results obtained are considered preliminary until more research can be done. |
|---|