Representaciones de la historia republicana y reciente: Marcelo en Virgilio y Propercio
This paper aims to distinguish between the types of poetic construction which seem to exist in Prop. III 18 and in Verg. Aen. VI 854 ss.: i.e., a poetic construction in terms of device, in the first case, and a poetic construction in terms of interpretation, in the second case. The paper is divided...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Cappelli
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=arti&d=Jpr10935 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to distinguish between the types of poetic construction which seem to exist in Prop. III 18 and in Verg. Aen. VI 854 ss.: i.e., a poetic construction in terms of device, in the first case, and a poetic construction in terms of interpretation, in the second case. The paper is divided into three parts. The analysis of each text results in a comment on the poetic construction of history that both poets produced; the last part deals with poetry and history and tries to frame the vision about the poetic construction of history in a broader discussion on the representation of history in order to point out some specific values of the representation of history in poetry. |
|---|