Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at √ s = 13 TeV
The performance of the missing transverse momentum (E<sup>miss</sup><sub>T</sub>) reconstruction with the ATLAS detector is evaluated using data collected in proton–proton collisions at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 2015. To reconstruct E<sup>miss</...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Articulo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/82804 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The performance of the missing transverse momentum (E<sup>miss</sup><sub>T</sub>) reconstruction with the ATLAS detector is evaluated using data collected in proton–proton collisions at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 2015. To reconstruct E<sup>miss</sup><sub>T</sub>, fully calibrated electrons, muons, photons, hadronically decaying τ-leptons , and jets reconstructed from calorimeter energy deposits and charged-particle tracks are used. These are combined with the soft hadronic activity measured by reconstructed charged-particle tracks not associated with the hard objects. Possible double counting of contributions from reconstructed charged-particle tracks from the inner detector, energy deposits in the calorimeter, and reconstructed muons from the muon spectrometer is avoided by applying a signal ambiguity resolution procedure which rejects already used signals when combining the various E<sup>miss</sup><sub>T</sub> contributions. The individual terms as well as the overall reconstructed E<sup>miss</sup><sub>T</sub> are evaluated with various performance metrics for scale (linearity), resolution, and sensitivity to the data-taking conditions. The method developed to determine the systematic uncertainties of the E<sup>miss</sup><sub>T</sub> scale and resolution is discussed. Results are shown based on the full 2015 data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb−1 . |
|---|