Two credulous notions for acceptance of arguments in abstract frameworks

Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain unspecified, the structure of arguments being the main abstraction. In this work, we use an extended argumentation framework where two kinds of defeat relation are present, in order to define two basi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Martínez, Diego C.
Formato:	Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:	Inglés
Publicado:	2006
Materias:	Ciencias Informáticas defeasible argumentation abstract frameworks argument extensions
Acceso en línea:	http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22678
Aporte de:	SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata

Ejemplares similares

Introducing dialectical bases in defeasible argumentation
por: Capobianco, Marcela, et al.
Publicado: (1999)

Modelling argumentation lines in abstract frameworks
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2005)

An abstract argumentation framework with comparison criterion
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2006)

An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
por: Cohen, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Admissible sets of arguments in a timed context
por: Cobo, María Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

DBI-DeLP: a framework for defeasible argumentation over databases
por: Deagustini, Cristhian A. D., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Towards an abstract characterization of the subargument relation
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
por: Stankevicius, Alejandro G., et al.
Publicado: (1999)

A framework for multiagent deliberation based on dialectical argumentation
por: Stankevicius, Alejandro G., et al.
Publicado: (2000)

A First Approach Towards Integrating Twitter and Defeasible Argumentation
por: Grosse, Kathrin, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

On semantics in dynamic argumentation frameworks
por: Cobo, María Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

An approach to argumentative reasoning servers with conditions based preference criteria
por: Teze, Juan Carlos, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A taxonomy for argumentative frameworks based on labelled deduction
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Publicado: (2001)

An Approach to Emotion-based Abstract Argumentative Reasoning
por: Fulladoza Dalibón, Santiago E., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Actions and arguments: preliminaries and examples
por: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo, et al.
Publicado: (2001)

Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation
por: García, Alejandro Javier, et al.
Publicado: (1998)

Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
por: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

An abstract machine for the execution of DeLP programs
por: Stankevicius, Alejandro G., et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
por: Budán, Paola D., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

On the use of contexts for representing knowledge in defeasible argumentation
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Publicado: (1995)

Distinguishing ground from nonground information in defeasible argumentation
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván, et al.
Publicado: (1995)

Operations on admissible attack scenarios
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván, et al.
Publicado: (1996)

Introducing multiple preference criteria in defeasible argumentation
por: Rotstein, Nicolás D., et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2001)

A logical framework for modeling argumentation using labelled deduction
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván, et al.
Publicado: (2000)

The role of labelled deductive systems in a formal system for defeasible argumentation
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván, et al.
Publicado: (1999)

Combining partial order planning with defeasible argumentation
por: García, Diego R., et al.
Publicado: (2005)

A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
por: Budán, Paola D., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A first approach to combining ontologies and defeasible argumentation for the semantic web
por: Gómez, Sergio Alejandro, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Abstract argumentation and dialogues between agents
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Modeling argumentation with labeled deduction: formalization and theoretical considerations
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván, et al.
Publicado: (2001)

Combining quantitative and qualitative reasoning in defeasible argumentation
por: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

The role of argument comparison in dialectical argumentation
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2000)

Combining a causal language with argumentation: a first approach
por: Cobo, María Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Embedding defeasible argumentation in the semantic web: an ontology-based approach
por: Gómez, Sergio Alejandro, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

An abstract model for the process of deliberation within multiagent systems
por: Stankevicius, Alejandro G., et al.
Publicado: (2001)