Introducing dialectical bases in defeasible argumentation
Defeasible argumentation is a form of defeasible reasoning, that emphasizes the notion of an argument. An argument A for a conclusion q is a tentative piece of reasoning which supports q. In an argumentative framework, common sense reasoning can be modeled as a process in which we must determine whe...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
1999
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22239 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Defeasible argumentation is a form of defeasible reasoning, that emphasizes the notion of an argument. An argument A for a conclusion q is a tentative piece of reasoning which supports q. In an argumentative framework, common sense reasoning can be modeled as a process in which we must determine whether an argument justifies its conclusion.
The process mentioned aboye takes considerable computational effort. For this reason it would be convenient to keep a repository of already computed justifications to save work already done with previously solved queries.
In this paper we introduce the concept of dialectical bases as a first step in direction to defining a justification maintenance system for argumentative frameworks. |
|---|