Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
In this article we present a generalized dynamic argumentation framework that handles arguments expressed in an abstract language assumed to be some first order logic fragment. Once the formalism is presented, we propose a reification to the description logic ALC with the intention to handle ontolog...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21687 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In this article we present a generalized dynamic argumentation framework that handles arguments expressed in an abstract language assumed to be some first order logic fragment. Once the formalism is presented, we propose a reification to the description logic ALC with the intention to handle ontology debugging. In this sense, since argumentation frameworks reason over graphs that relate arguments through attack, our methodology is proposed to bridge ontological inconsistency sources to attack relations in argumentation. Finally, an argumentation semantics is proposed as a consistency restoration tool to cope with the ontology debugging. |
|---|