Specifying agent interaction protocols
Argumentation-based negotiation is an adequate alternative for modelling situations in which agents have limited information and bounded capacities. In this research line, each agent elaborates arguments as part of its own planning process and also to justify its proposals, counter-proposals and rej...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21169 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Argumentation-based negotiation is an adequate alternative for modelling situations in which agents have limited information and bounded capacities. In this research line, each agent elaborates arguments as part of its own planning process and also to justify its proposals, counter-proposals and rejections during the negotiation process.
Our proposal analyzes and compares three tools for the specification of interaction protocols: finite state machines, UML, and dialogues games. |
|---|