Embedding defeasible argumentation in the semantic web: an ontology-based approach
The SemanticWeb is a project intended to create a universal medium for information exchange by giving semantics to the content of documents on the Web by means of ontology definitions. Ontologies intended for knowledge representation in intelligent agents rely on common-sense reasoning formalizatio...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21150 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The SemanticWeb is a project intended to create a universal medium for information exchange by giving semantics to the content of documents on the Web by means of ontology definitions.
Ontologies intended for knowledge representation in intelligent agents rely on common-sense reasoning formalizations. Defeasible argumentation has emerged as a successful approach to model common-sense reasoning. Recent research has linked argumentation with belief revision in order to model the dynamics of knowledge. This paper outlines an approach which combines ontologies, argumentation and belief revision by defining an ontology algebra. We suggest how different aspects of ontology integration can be defined in terms of defeasible argumentation and belief revision. |
|---|