An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | Cohen, Andrea, García, Alejandro Javier, Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573 |
| Aporte de: |
Ejemplares similares
-
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Modelling argumentation lines in abstract frameworks
por: Martínez, Diego C., et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Two credulous notions for acceptance of arguments in abstract frameworks
por: Martínez, Diego C.
Publicado: (2006) -
On semantics in dynamic argumentation frameworks
por: Cobo, María Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Admissible sets of arguments in a timed context
por: Cobo, María Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2010)