Social choice situations and aggregation criteria: inductive reasoning in social shoice theory
The usual procedure in Social Choice Theory consists in postulating some desirable properties which a aggregation procedure should verify and from them to derive the features of the corresponding social choice function and the outcomes that arise at each possible profile of preferences. In this pape...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/164837 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The usual procedure in Social Choice Theory consists in postulating some desirable properties which a aggregation procedure should verify and from them to derive the features of the corresponding social choice function and the outcomes that arise at each possible profile of preferences. In this paper we invert this line of reasoning and try to infer, up from what we call social situations (each one consisting of a profile and the associated social ordering) the criteria verified in the implicit aggregation procedure. Furthermore we derive them in axiomatic form. This inference process, which extracts intentional from extensional information can be seen as an exercise in social choice-theoretic “statistics”. The fact that complete intentional characterizations of the aggregation process cannot be derived in such way can be easily seen as a consequence of the procedure. |
|---|