Investigating the growing population of massive quiescent galaxies at cosmic noon

We explore the buildup of quiescent galaxies using a sample of 28,469 massive ( ★ ≥ 1011M ) galaxies at redshifts 1.5 < < 3.0, drawn from a 17.5 deg2 area (0.33 Gpc3 comoving volume at these redshifts). This allows for a robust study of the quiescent fraction as a function of mass at...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sherman, Sydney, Jogee, Shardha, Florez, Jonathan, Stevans, Matthew L., Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee, Wold, Isak, Finkelstein, Steven L., Papovich, Casey, Ciardullo, Robin, Gronwall, Caryl, Cora, Sofía Alejandra, Hough, Tomás, Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio
Formato: Articulo Preprint
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/125002
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:We explore the buildup of quiescent galaxies using a sample of 28,469 massive ( ★ ≥ 1011M ) galaxies at redshifts 1.5 < < 3.0, drawn from a 17.5 deg2 area (0.33 Gpc3 comoving volume at these redshifts). This allows for a robust study of the quiescent fraction as a function of mass at 1.5 < < 3.0 with a sample ∼40 times larger at log( ★/M )≥ 11.5 than previous studies. We derive the quiescent fraction using three methods: specific star-formation rate, distance from the main sequence, and UVJ color-color selection. All three methods give similar values at 1.5 < < 2.0, however the results differ by up to a factor of two at 2.0 < < 3.0. At redshifts 1.5 < < 3.0 the quiescent fraction increases as a function of stellar mass. By = 2, only 3.3 Gyr after the Big Bang, the universe has quenched ∼25% of ★ = 1011M galaxies and ∼45% of ★ = 1012M galaxies. We discuss physical mechanisms across a range of epochs and environments that could explain our results. We compare our results with predictions from hydrodynamical simulations SIMBA and IllustrisTNG and semi-analytic models (SAMs) SAG, SAGE, and Galacticus. The quiescent fraction from IllustrisTNG is higher than our empirical result by a factor of 2 − 5, while those from SIMBA and the three SAMs are lower by a factor of 1.5 − 10 at 1.5 < < 3.0.