“Taking the ‘art’ of music for granted: a critical sociology of the aesthetic philosophy of music"
Musicians and teachers are wrong to take as a guarantee of "art" the nature, function and value of music, that is, as a matter of aesthetic pleasure, metacognitive expression or great "intellectual culture." When such assumptions are identified with what music is, what it is and...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universitat de València
2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/LEEME/article/view/9764 http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=es/es-021&d=article9764oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Musicians and teachers are wrong to take as a guarantee of "art" the nature, function and value of music, that is, as a matter of aesthetic pleasure, metacognitive expression or great "intellectual culture." When such assumptions are identified with what music is, what it is and how good it is, we have a kind of elitism or snobbery (Lynes, 1966) that leaves the aesthetes in a socioeconomic or intellectual limbo complaining that What they enjoy and value guarantees educational and economic prominence. But if music as art were so clearly and clearly valuable to other intelligent people as to musical musicians and educators, their importance to education and society would not have to be continually defended. |
|---|