Effects of public-private partnerships for development (PPPD) between the Peruvian State and the mining sector in the legitimation or delegitimation of local governments. The case of the Mining Programme of Solidarity with People (MPSP), 2006-2011
Since the 1990s, public private partnerships (PPP) began to be seen not only as the most efficient instrument against market and state´s failures, but also as the most efficient instrument to achieve development. This type of partnerships is called public-private partnerships for development (PPPD)...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Ediciones Complutense
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/56023 http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=es/es-028&d=article56023oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Since the 1990s, public private partnerships (PPP) began to be seen not only as the most efficient instrument against market and state´s failures, but also as the most efficient instrument to achieve development. This type of partnerships is called public-private partnerships for development (PPPD) or partnerships for development. They are voluntary and have been promoted by the United Nations to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and, currently, to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). This paper explores, through a case study, the effects that a PPPD in particular, the so-called Mining Programme of Solidarity with the People (MPSP) carried out between the Peruvian State and the mining sector, has had in the legitimation or delegitimation of local governments in Peru during the period 2006 to 2011. |
|---|