Anachronism in the writing of History: ¿Error or Possibility? Some reflections about the concept of time in Carlo Ginzburg, Marc Bloch and Georges Didi-Huberman
In his unfinished and posthumously published book Apologie pour l’histoire, Marc Bloch bestowed on future historians a seminal legacy of critical reflections on the concept of time as the object of historical analysis. During the last decades, the concept of time in History has experienced a renewed...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares Peer review article |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Human and Economic Sciences Faculty, National University of Colombia (Medellín)
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/hisysoc/article/view/52609 http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=co/co-020&d=article52609oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In his unfinished and posthumously published book Apologie pour l’histoire, Marc Bloch bestowed on future historians a seminal legacy of critical reflections on the concept of time as the object of historical analysis. During the last decades, the concept of time in History has experienced a renewed interest by professional historians, in particular in reference to the category of anachronism. The Italian historian Carlo Ginzburg and the French art historian Georges Didi-Huberman are among those engaged in this debate. This article offers a reading of two works by these historians with the purpose of underlying the fundamental influence that Marc Bloch’s ideas on time had in Ginzburg and Didi-Hubermans’ critical interventions. |
|---|