The triple boundary: immigration and social integration in Spain
On the academic literature in the field, it has been argued that nation states have a double boundary: the first that refers to the right of states to refuse, admit or expel people; and the second one, which is internal, where states decide who of the people residing in its borders enjoy access to s...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares ciegos |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://huellasdelamigracion.uaemex.mx/article/view/11387 http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-011&d=article11387oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | On the academic literature in the field, it has been argued that nation states have a double boundary: the first that refers to the right of states to refuse, admit or expel people; and the second one, which is internal, where states decide who of the people residing in its borders enjoy access to social, economic and political benefits, that is, it demarcates the exclusion or inclusion of citizen rights. However, this paper proposes the idea of a third frontier that implies that even enjoying the citizen rights, the conditions of economic and social exclusion can continue, since the immigrant’s stigma does not stop after the acquisition of nationality. The objective of this paper is to contrast these approaches empirically for the Spanish case. |
|---|